Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Surg 1997 226(2): 169–173Ĭollard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture. Wong J, Cheung H, Lui R, Fan YW, Smith A, Siu KF.
Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. Worrell S, Mumtaz S, Tsuboi K, Lee TH, Mittal SK. Esophageal delta-shaped anastomosis: a new method of stapled anastomosis for the cervical esophagus and digestive tract. Okushiba S, Kawarada Y, Shichinohe T, Manase H, Kitashiro S, Katoh H. Systematic investigation of gastrointestinal diseases in China (SILC): validation of survey methodology. Yan X, Wang R, Zhao Y, Ma X, Fang J, Yan H, Kang X, Yin P, Hao Y, Li Q, Dent J, Sung J, Zou D, Johansson S, Halling K, Liu W, He J. Reflux symptom questionnaire in the diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis. Zhang L, Zhou LY, Lin SR, Ding SG, Huang YH, Gu F, Li Y, Zhang J, Yan XE, Meng LM, Zhang DH, Huang SM, Qu XF. The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Can J Surg 1977 20(5):454–459Ĭarlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E, Johnsson F, Junghard O, Lauritsen K, Riley S, Lundell L. Carcinoma of the esophagus: a new proposal for the evaluation of treatment. Stoller JL, Samer KJ, Toppin DI, Flores AD.
Esophagogastrostomy by side-to-side anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a randomized clinical trial. Surgery 2004 136(4): 917–925Įdge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques. Santos RS, Raftopoulos Y, Singh D, DeHoyos A, Fernando HC, Keenan RJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ. Dis Esophagus 2002 15(4): 296–302Įrcan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybichi LA, Blackstone EH (2005) Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influences the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129(3): 623–631
Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mid-term outcomes of side-to-side stapled anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H. The linear stapled esophagogastrostomy could decrease anastomotic stricture without increasing gastroesophageal reflux. The reflux score in LS group was lower than other two groups ( H = 6.995, P = 0.030). The operative complications were documented in 15 patients (5.1%), with no difference among three groups ( χ 2 = 2.215, P = 0.330). There was one operative death in the HS group. Three groups of patients were comparable on clinical baseline characteristics. The patients were followed-up and compared at 3 months after the operation. Patients received either a linear stapled (LS group, n = 166), conventional hand-sewn (HS group, n = 59), or circular stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (CS group, n = 68).
Methodīetween October 2007 and October 2009, 293 patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer underwent a curative intent resection. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the operative effects of linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy with hand-sewn or circular stapled anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture.
0 kommentar(er)
